Rumor: Samsung presents Galaxy Note 5 mid-August

Jul

12

2015

Samsung Galaxy Note 5 would like to invite all mid-August, to avoid a new iPhone presenting Samsungs great phones will overshadow that. Samsung presented its discs sets last four years each at IFA electronics fair.

It seems that someone at Samsung wanted the news out early: business newspaper The Wall Street Journal and news agency Reuters published the information virtually simultaneously. Both articles mention an exact date, but naming mid-August as the period for presentation.

Both articles are not appoint or Samsung beside the Note 5 still presents several products. There go all months of rumors about a round smart watch the South Korean manufacturer and a larger version of the Galaxy S6 Edge , named Galaxy S6 Edge Plus.

Samsung would like to bring forward the presentation to be Apple. The expectation is that Apple are new suspected iPhone and iPhone 6s 6s Plus late August and presents releases in September. Both companies have made no announcements about when they present their new products.

Probable Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus
Probable Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus

“Tax showed interest in software Hacking Team ‘
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 again gets Zombie Mode

Read more about

Samsung Galaxy Note 5

no price

Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Plus

no price

Smartphones Samsung Galaxy Note Galaxy S Samsung smartphones

Related content

07-07
News – Underestimating popularity would turnover Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge press
11-06
News – Rumor: Samsung Galaxy Note has 5 USB port c
04-06
News – Photos show alleged enlarge Galaxy S6 Edge

Comments (90)
Response Filter:
90 88 57 2
0
Moderation faq • Change view
1 2 Next
Rough ER
July 10, 2015 11:55
Too bad actually that they must respond to the release of iphones. The samsung note series is much more sophisticated and as the iphones? That pen that has the note 4 is working really well, and the screen, the camera, the removable battery, micro SD card slot and standard 32GB memory, and a screen to body ratio of nearly 75% are still aspects that samsung far far ahead of its direct competitors.
Peabz21
Ruw ER • July 10, 2015 13:12
You forget that many people buy an iPhone on the “feel”. There are just a lot of Apple fans who are very brand loyalty. Which do not even look at what the rest has to offer. That Samsung could almost not stand on boxing.
just mike tech
@ Peabz21 • July 10, 2015 16:23
There I then an exception on. Have some time had a Galaxy Note 2. Ben eventually went back to iPhone because iOS apps and the iPhone still turned smoother and less frequently crashed. In short, I do look at Samsung, but then they have to deliver something good. Would now again consider buying a Galaxy Note, Tocco is now stripped and the phone works smoothly.
Tothabone
@ Peabz21 • July 10, 2015 18:51
Sure, they can do it by putting several consecutive years top products in the market. Believe me you can still have many fans but you screwed it two years in a row then you still have a real problem. At Samsung have just too many ups and downs + the fact that you at Apple sure you over the next 3.5 years can do with your phone where you also get updates. Samsung and Android in general, you may be very happy with 1.5 years of support and if there is a new operating system then it takes several months before you can use it as this is already the case.

On advertising and marketing spoken Apple simply master. I’ve really never seen a banner advertisement or poster pass by. Walk in the average town and you will be bombarded with Samsung ads. What Apple does not fairly brilliant idea but it is if you need 10 times less budget and ultimately are even more famous.
ICU2
@ Peabz21 • July 10, 2015 19:47
Everyone makes his choice based on feeling.
Indeed, there are many consumers who buy Samsung devices while in China there are alternatives that cost less.

On feeling choosing people still prefer to Samsung.
And it’s true there are many Apple fans and why they would be at risk by purchasing a device which costs the same but where they have instinctively doubts.
The same of course applies to a lot of android users who take no iPhone because they have there instinctively doubts.

Apparently emotion good for making decisions where they post any bad feeling gets.
simplicidad
Ruw ER • July 10, 2015 12:15

… Are still aspects that samsung far far ahead of its direct competitors.

..and all the respect in which the average consumer does not give a hoot, let alone who understand half of what you mention now. That fact is the problem of many companies it purely as an specs wars trying to approach.

I still find it surprising that in 2015 we still assume that the consumer tack is going to go as he / she will face all kinds of technical stuff. I hear that story because since Android v1.

I had received a dollar for every tweaker – who urgently once the book “The inmates are running the asylum” must read – announces the next iPhone killer, I would have probably been more money in my account than Apple now.

It’s just logical that Samsung is trying to release to another time. You can not assume that the iPhone is a popular thing is what gets attention and then Samsung is also aware. It wants to find that their device gets full attention.

[Response changed by simplicidad on July 10, 2015 12:17]
Dual Infinity
simplicidad • July 10, 2015 13:06

where the average consumer gives a hoot, let alone who understand half of what you mention now

“Camera”, “replaceable battery,” “32GB memory.”

Indeed. Typical things that the average consumer never has.
No one complains about bad smartphone cameras or creates good variants.
Nobody complains about short battery-life on smartphones.
No one has suffered from too little space on his smartphone. Especially iPhone owners who do not want to update.

I had received a dollar for every tweaker – who urgently once the book “The inmates are running the asylum” must read – announces the next iPhone killer, I would have probably been more money in my account than Apple now.

Android has towards 80% market share worldwide. Even in the US goes (after a long time) that way. The concept iPhone’killer ‘for consumers already passé.

For the marketing departments it is a different story. That obsession with old feuds and motivated by numbers and design renders ‘wisdom’. Unfortunately, the resulting marketing blurbs are so often repeated by various parties that consumers will believe that 1280×720 on a phone “really out ‘is what the collective illusion strengthened and the marketing blurbs relabels a self-fulfilling prophecy.

People who imply that the consumer does not care about “all kinds of technical stuff (like battery life 8) 7 ) Contribute to the strengthening of that illusion. Let’s not keep marketing delusion together, but the importance of functional features shout from the rooftops.
Optel Ommetje
Dual Infinity • July 10, 2015 14:09
Well, in the US, iOS 35% market share in Europe and nearly 20%. With a few phones in front of hundreds Adroids.

The next iPhone is another guarantee of success. Apple has ordered a record 90 million units. The fact that Apple 90% of the total profit in the market absorbs the competitor hopes to really make an iPhone killer. It fails all. Certainly not Samsung, with poor support, little updates, as expensive, but above all: no vision or focus.
Since a miljoenmilhard megapixels camera helps absolutely nothing to …
Carbon [Tweakers 15 Donation]
Optelsommetje • July 10, 2015 17:34

Well, in the US, iOS 35% market share in Europe and nearly 20%.

35%?

Meanwhile, the 47.7% for iOS, Android 47.6%.

Apple iOS leads US OS share for the first time since Q4 2012
Green tea
Carbon • July 10, 2015 20:18
Really do not know where you see that? Click once on the link provided in the article that you cite:

http: //www.kantarworldpan…artphone-os-market-share/

You can also make additional comparisons beautiful …
Dual Infinity
Optelsommetje • July 10, 2015 16:16

The fact that Apple 90% of the total profit in the market absorbs the competitor hopes to really make an iPhone killer

You get some things together. The reason to make iPhones generate as much profit does not necessarily with their quality and / or functionality. It is also fashion and status.

Separately, I responded to the following:

I still find it surprising that in 2015 we still assume that the consumer tack is going to go as he / she will face all kinds of technical stuff. I hear that story because since Android v1.

I had received a dollar for every tweaker – who urgently once the book “The inmates are running the asylum” must read – announces the next iPhone killer, I would have probably been more money in my account than Apple now.

So here it is clearly not about profit, but tacking reaching consumers. In short, your reply is offtopic.
Typecast-L
Dual Infinity • July 10, 2015 16:58

You get some things together. The reason to make iPhones generate as much profit does not necessarily with their quality and / or functionality. It is also fashion and status.

I do not totally agree. Fashion is generally a thing of come and go. The iPhone would be so for years now in vogue. That’s “fashion” do not. An iPhone is working just fine, do what the consumer wants and looks for another stylish. In addition, Apple has created a gigantic ecosystem that once you invest not happy to get off. (Because, so it works no reason for that) This is what the average consumer wants who just want to have something that works and works well. If the iPhone would not work well then there can be no question at all of fashion or status. Therefore imo related to the success of the iPhone with much more quality and / or functionality as fors shows than fashion / status as you say.

[Response changed by Typecast-L on July 10, 2015 17:18]
Dual Infinity
Typecast @ L • July 10, 2015 19:01

The iPhone would be so for years now in vogue. That’s “fashion” do not.

Yes. Some things have been for years in fashion. That in some areas faster changes than in other areas does not mean that the concept of fashion for the latter type does not apply.

Fashion is about to hear it there and your choice of a particular product or a particular style to rely on what many other people / call instead based on rational considerations. In that sense you could say that the iPhone is in the bashing bandwagon.

This is what the average consumer wants, who just wants to have something that works and works well.

Although I agree with the principle, this remains a tattle tale to apply iPhones. Those things sometimes work just absolutely no good / nice. Look at the new iOS beta with the fantastic new feature: ‘Return to the previous app. Super. Only since Android 1.0 to Android.
So there are many things to mention of nonsense for years is in iOS or years has been in without the people have stopped to say that it works so fantastic (caps lock indicator on the virtual keypad, anyone? – – ridiculous).
Typecast-L
Dual Infinity • July 10, 2015 20:09

Although I agree with the principle, this remains a tattle tale to apply iPhones. Those things sometimes work just absolutely no good / nice. Look at the new iOS beta with the fantastic new feature: ‘Return to the previous app. Super. Only since Android 1.0 to Android.

Good example also, you get something that is not working properly in beta. Three guesses which serve betas for. Additionally, is not that an iPhone without this feature does not work meters. Nice that this function is to come but we have not been able to for years and I’ve never missed it .. Your comment is therefore incomprehensible.

[Response changed by Typecast-L on July 10, 2015 20:10]
Dual Infinity
Typecast @ L • July 10, 2015 22:26

Good example also, you get something that is not working properly in beta.

I have no idea if it works well and it is also irrelevant. I was talking about a very basic user-friendly feature for years was missing in iOS. As there are so many years failed, and / or are still missing.

Additionally, is not that an iPhone without this feature does not work meters.

Stroman. It was claimed that an iPhone just works well, and I campaigned against it. I campaigned not for the proposition that the iPhone works for a meter.

Nice that this function is to come but we have not been able to for years and I’ve never missed it

Classic statement. In a month you can not live without, and find it a great feature. The core of what I do in this particular piece was trying to say is that (for years) enough arguments against the indiscriminate and false statement that an iPhone ‘works well’. Unless your definition of ‘good’ stretches to ‘just as Apple believes that it should be’.
Typecast-L
Dual Infinity • July 11, 2015 16:51

Classic statement. In a month you can not live without, and find it a great feature. The core of what I do in this particular piece was trying to say is that (for years) enough arguments against the indiscriminate and false statement that an iPhone ‘works well’. Unless your definition of ‘good’ stretches to ‘just as Apple believes that it should be’.

See message from quantumleapje, something with nail and head.
But let us now for fun even turn the argument.
How many ” features “do not sit there in Android phones where everyone only too happy without a will. Just about everyone I know put a whole bunch of these features directly from when buying a new appliance. Some of these “features” you can not even turn off even if you wanted it. Of course, there are good features between Samsung but take as an example, their quantity is really about quality when it comes to “features”. Then give me the iPhone but with its “big” shortfall “features”.

I tell you that I’m the new page option that comes up to now have not yet missed. And that’s really the case. The same goes for picture in picture video and other new software features that are coming. You act like an iPhone really is a gigantic bolt extension and it works for not meter because you’re not with one click can return to a previous app / page. I do now about 2 clicks .. gosh say what a disaster. IF I wish I could have put it for years on my iPhone these features. From day one I have an iPhone, they are both gejaibreaked. Nowadays you it does not take 3 minutes to jailbreak your device and really anyone can do it. Then it takes you a few minutes to install this functionality through Cydia. I have as yet seen no necessity because as I indicated earlier, the “feature” did not miss.

[Response changed by Typecast-L on July 11, 2015 17:01]
Dual Infinity
Typecast @ L • July 11, 2015 18:41

How many “features” do not sit there in Android phones where everyone only too happy without a will. Just about everyone I know put a whole bunch of these features directly from when buying a new appliance.

This is indeed quite the reverse logic. You actually says something like: in some car types sometimes sit armrests, cup holders, cigarette lighters where some people are waiting, and therefore it is good that there is in (for example) a Lamborghini but are very few extras.
That of course makes no sense at all.

You act like an iPhone really is a gigantic bolt extension and it works for not meter because you’re not with one click can return to a previous app / page.

Nope, another stooge. I never implied. In fact, I think it’s fine devices. I only say that the statement “an iPhone works just fine” unjust and that anything on the operation of iPhones (and iPads) is to be regarded and has been regarded. iTunes is cunt, the file system is such gesandboxed which data from one app to another accesses in 95% of cases is not doing (so unless the dev specifically ignoring the fact), support for various file formats is jerk, The virtual keypad is extremely moderate and old (though you since iOS8 finally replaced by Swype / Swiftkey), etc., etc.

Nowadays you it does not take 3 minutes to jailbreak your device and really anyone can do it. Then it takes you a few minutes to install this functionality through Cydia.

The classic jailbreak cop-out. But nice that you bring forward. The percentages vary, but anywhere from 5% to 15% of iPhones are jailbroken. Apparently there is still a non-negligible group of people that the standard functionality than anything wants more. Then there is also no doubt a group that also wants but does not dare to jailbreak.

Admittedly, with Android is much more rooted (estimate: ~ 25%), but that is 9/10 times to remove all kinds of bloatware or just stock Android for flashing, not because people lack features (pretty much everything except the status bar and The settings screen is customizable, so the features that you may have been missing to get a simple app install). And yes, non-removable bloatware is terrible and Android phone manufacturers who do that should get me a very hard kick in consumer friendliness. I buy myself out basically no phone that is not bootable root. My device, my rules. But that aside.

You remember, incidentally, that basically all Apple apps on an iPhone also technically bloatware: http://gizmodo.com/596844…for-every-stock-apple-app
That is just less so experienced, because you have no choice in that area if you want to iOS.
Typecast-L
Dual Infinity • July 11, 2015 19:48
You know what is the problem of many people own opinions presented as facts. Such people can not just go along in discussion because they know in advance all that they can never be wrong. Their opinion is ultimately always right. You’re there as one : + You say a bed but do you believe it is a fact, you will find the iPhone an excellent device, but it works just fine statement is not correct. 8) 7 a great device still works by definition good, otherwise it would not fine device. Do not you see how incredible this is contradictory?

A smartphone apps without stock is not a smartphone because you can not texting, email, calendar appointments, video calling etc. How can you call something now serious bloatware as required basic software for a phone. Maybe you need another look up the definition of bloatware.

Anyways wasted enough time on this conversation, I’m not going through with it. If you read your own texts once objective then hopefully you can understand why.

Cheers!
Dual Infinity
Typecast @ L • July 11, 2015 20:10

Their opinion is ultimately always right. You’re there as one

Ad hominem. Do you like the content, please. If I did something incorrectly treated or have made discussion of technical errors, feel free to quote me and improve.

a great device still works by definition good, otherwise it would not fine device.

Now you turn the original text. The classic text (and if it was also presented) is “an iPhone just works and works well”
It’s such iOS fanboy mantra of the ‘no nonsense, it just works’ and it implies that there is practically nothing wrong.

If we your definition (= fine works well) would apply, then actually work all devices ‘good’. In short, there is a difference between ‘good’ and ‘just right’.

A smartphone apps without stock is not a smartphone because you can not texting, email, calendar appointments, video calling etc. How can you call something now serious bloatware as required basic software for a phone. Maybe you need another look up the definition of bloatware.

Nonsense.
1. ‘Video Call’ is far from being “required basic software ‘
2. The definition of a smartphone stores on the possibilities, not necessarily out of the box.
3. Apps. People what juices nowadays much more than they texting. Nevertheless, you should install it afterwards. Problem? No: fine. Well even.
4. Ideally, a smartphone was nothing more than a bare computer, you could set up an OS to your liking. Hardware and software disconnected. Would you be a smartphone that you still iOS, Windows and Android could not call installing ones smartphone?

Anyways wasted enough time on this conversation, I’m not going through with it.

All right.
quantumleapje
Dual Infinity • July 10, 2015 20:12
It’s not about features, it comes to the whole. If you do not understand, you will never understand why Apple has been successful and will continue. “Mode” and “marketing” are naturally easier to “understand”.
Optel Ommetje
Dual Infinity • July 10, 2015 17:45
So no. Quality is determined not only by a miljoenmilard pixels gb’s cores or whatever. Simplicity combined with a super eco operating system including continuous updates and enhancements do the math.
That’s why Apple wins many years. Not because it is the ‘mode’ as you say, but since winning the tough market. See below …
Dual Infinity
Optelsommetje • July 10, 2015 18:50

That’s why Apple wins many years. Not because it is the ‘mode’ as you say, but since winning the tough market.

Whew.
1. Apple ‘wins’ does not. It depends greatly on how you “win” define.
2. Apple does not win tough market. ” View each chart on worldwide market share and you see that they just have to hand severely in recent years. RDF much?
3. Your reply is still adamant offtopic.
Optel Ommetje
Dual Infinity • July 10, 2015 19:22
Phew! 1. 2. and 3.
If almost all the profit there is in the market picks up, you are winning. If you continue to grab market share with one model of almost 50% is winning. Nothing surrender, Apple wins just the last year, many market!
If you support your users with continuous improvements and updates that win. Win so!
Regarding market share and called off topic see also comments onCarbon and @ Typecast-L hear hear! T

[Response changed by Optel Ommetje on July 10, 2015 19:23]
Dual Infinity
Optelsommetje • July 10, 2015 19:43

If you support your users with continuous improvements and updates that win. Win so!

According to that definition gaining nearly everyone (except Microsoft ;-)).

Further:

http: //www.extremetech.co…13/07/global-computer.png
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/…phone-os-market-share.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/…Wide_Smartphone_Sales.png
http://dazeinfo.com/wp-co…-market-share-Q4-2014.png

Anyway, I respect your right to believe whatever you want to believe.

edit: BB tag fix.

[Response changed by Dual Infinity on July 10, 2015 19:45]
quantumleapje
Dual Infinity • July 10, 2015 20:17
Problem for all other manufacturers is that Apple marketshare realizes only in the high end and in that segment, which alone is structurally profitable, with almost all profits going to run.
Optel Ommetje
quantumleapje • July 10, 2015 21:39
Yep that’s where the challenge lies for Samsung. Hence they try it now with 800 phones. Copy as usual ..
Carbon [Tweakers 15 Donation]
Dual Infinity • July 10, 2015 17:36

Even in the US goes (after a long time) that way. The concept iPhone’killer ‘for consumers already passé.

Nope, in the US, Apple has for the first time since 2012, a larger market share than Android!

[Response edited by Carbon on July 10, 2015 17:36]
Dual Infinity
Carbon • July 10, 2015 18:47
Unless you click through to their own interactive DataViz. Then ~ 65% market share for Android.

One way or another, at the global level is the point anyway still: The concept iPhone’killer ‘for consumers already passé.
Optel Ommetje
Dual Infinity • July 10, 2015 19:24
Ai, at least not the 80% outlined by you ??
Dual Infinity
Optelsommetje • July 10, 2015 19:44
Towards the 80% worldwide. This was about the US
Try again.
Vegettokai
Dual Infinity • July 10, 2015 21:02
It is also not difficult as companies like Samsung releases 100 models per year and iOS manufacturer but two 😊
Dual Infinity
Vegettokai • July 10, 2015 22:35

It is also not difficult as companies like Samsung releases 100 models per year and iOS manufacturer but 2

That is simply nonsense.

As a market to conquer alone would mean especially as many cast models, we now have 2000 different Logitech keyboards (like) seen. The number of models per se is irrelevant.

You could say that the market segment in which certain models are released influence, but it can be seen by noting that Apple really can not make to release a cheap iPhone. The lower segment enter your name automatically means losing exclusivity.

The disadvantage of the lower segment of the market is that you have to shoot people does not step and can push no secondary products within that segment or can sell data on that segment.
quantumleapje
Dual Infinity • July 10, 2015 22:58
The smartphone market seen as one market is a theoretical vision. Apple competes with the high-end Android and Windows phones and that’s it. Apple may not care how many phones iOS and I do not see change as 100 different Android devices to capture a large share of the market.

So that’s certainly not ancient history. I’ve always had for this iPhone Android devices (nexus) and felt shabbily behavior and half-baked support for Android not as a fantastic drive.

[Response changed by simplicidad on July 11, 2015 00:07]
Dual Infinity
simplicidad • July 11, 2015 14:36

That is no illusion that is more than 14 years experience in developing products for consumers. The average consumer is interested not give a shit for technical matters. It’s one reason why every ux / design course repeats the mantra “You are not your user.”

You go straight away with the error in attacking a straw man. I never claimed that consumers over ‘no shit’ give technical issues. I implied that battery life does not fall under the heading of technical issues.

Samsung itself is that through because where the first marketing mainly revolved around multiple cores, RAM, PPI and the like – concepts that the average consumer is completely alien – which today is resolutely different.

People learn the concept of multiple cores really understand roughly, after some exposure to it. They interpret it simply as ‘more is better’. Sat ‘ordinary consumers’ calling’ yes but mine is quad! “.

“It’s only just status and mode”

Again a figurehead. This I did not say (hint, it lies in the word ‘only’).

weird status symbol as everyone walks around with it

1. Not everyone runs with it.
2. If it is (relatively) expensive, it counts.
3. If I had a dollar for every time raises an iPhone fanboy that other people are just jealous because they can not afford the iPhone, I was a millionaire. Literally. That is literally said at least one million times.

By the way how many iPhone owners do you know who complain about the battery

6.

(How many iPhone owners do you know who complain about) camera

Little (that of the top 4 does not appear to be). But that is precisely a typical technical feature that the average consumer does not care, right? And where Apple also (rightly, incidentally) to be praised. By including those consumers who have nothing to give. I think you’re not quite clear how this debate is structured.

Have you ever looked at the figures for satisfaction? The figures in terms of brand loyality? There’s a bit more to it than “sheeple” behavior.

Right: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-purchase_rationalization
And: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vendor_lock-in

That market share says little when I notice that 99% of all the attention goes to iOS.

This is demonstrable nonsense and based on anecdotal evidence. The world is bigger than what you experience.
In this particular case, it could well be that your tent is especially good in iOS devven and get IOS commands. See also below.

So that’s certainly not ancient history.

You “that” refers to something completely different. I said it before the other manufacturers was passé to get an ‘iPhone killer’ on the market. It does so, and in that sense I am partially agree with you that iOS still preferred by many app builders have who want to earn money with the app itself. It remains a different audience and it shows in the revenue from the stores: http://dazeinfo.com/wp-co…-platform-app-revenue.png (incidentally growing revenue to be slightly harder than Android in iOS, but the difference is still significant). For companies, however, want to offer an app for free as a service on top of their normal services it is much obvious liggender to devven Android first.

MrDayOff
Dual Infinity • July 10, 2015 20:26
Apparently you hear those things around you, but to me on the IT department you certainly hear about it. If your devices together puts you see weldegelijk huge quality difference in the screens, bigger picture while the body is virtually the same size, and Camera resolution photos. Ultimately it makes the iPhone users are also not (they say), they just want to iOS. So a real battle is not nice that the companies increasingly do their best to improve the product.

watercoolertje

[karma emperor]
Samsung
[karma emperor] Samsung Galaxy Note
[karma king]
Smartphones
[karma king] Samsung Galaxy S

Ruw ER • July 10, 2015 12:03
You may have to lie but if all media 2x gives so much attention to Apple (considering everything is always compared to Apple), then as you become as the article says overshadows and can you better for it. Are incidentally wonder if coming from or which still has around the normal time, but would be smart if they thereby rather than Apple’s presentation. VAT SD card and removable battery could sometimes be canceled!

[Response changed by watercoolertje on July 10, 2015 12:04]
Nokie
watercoolertje • July 10, 2015 12:34
Frankly, I find it just as Samsung really involved in is guilty: they really do a lot of efforts to position themselves against Apple. If they assume more of their own power (which they certainly are), then I do not know if it’s still all around Apple would run. Ultimately, Apple’s next – in my opinion anyway, already weakened my enthusiasm year after year off – a very fine-tech company that their marketing is very neat in order to keep themselves constantly in the media. And they have – to my knowledge – no patent or monopoly, so in theory, anyone can. Samsung also has a mega-marketing budget, but they do much less for me along.

nms2003
nokie • July 10, 2015 13:30
They give 10 times more on marketing. The problem is that they lack (be) soul (ing). Nobody knows what the vision of Samsung and why they make their devices as they make them. That’s Apple crystal clear and unchanged since the origin of the company; Designing the best devices for technical opportunities for everyone to make it accessible by seeking inescapable design solutions.
Rough ER
@ nms2003 • July 11, 2015 01:04
The best devices? For 700 euros, the iPhone 6 should have a 1080p display. And 32gb memory. And 2gb ram. And optical image stabilization. LTE and cat 6. Yes, the iPhone 6 is good, and the software is good, but one of the reasons that Apple is the richest company in the world, is the fact that it seemed the light among consumers hard. And they steal sales records with it, which is obviously an incomprehensible achievement. I would have no more than 500 euros for the iPhone 6.

nms2003
Ruw ER • July 11, 2015 09:44
Excuse me. Apple is outside Samsung the only manufacturer that makes a profit. All it succeeds sell cheaper not to make a profit. They are therefore, in fact, not viable. Samsung is just as expensive, but you will actually lifted a paw; almost no updates, inferior hardware design, software that is unsafe, subsidized with your private data and also € 100, – smartphones state.

[Response changed by nms2003 on July 11, 2015 09:45]
Panh3ad
@ nms2003 • July 10, 2015 22:00
You confuse vision with arrogance and self-evidently believes there also.
“the best devices,” that’s quite subjective, do not you think?
nms2003
@ Panh3ad • July 10, 2015 23:34
The reviews show otherwise. The figures also. And the actual build quality too.
Tell me differently once why Apple is the only one new consumer electronics markets may start fire …

[Response changed by nms2003 on July 10, 2015 23:35]
Panh3ad
@ nms2003 • July 11, 2015 12:24
Tell you first go why you think they are the only ones new consumer electronics markets fire started. Basically you attach a biased faith in this company.

Vegettokai
watercoolertje • July 10, 2015 20:57
That is also because Samsung itself does not compete with other Android manufacturers. They only compete with Apple. DT do them yourself. You will never see a comparison between the Galaxy and HTC s6 one9 a Samsung advertisement
pimsaint
Ruw ER • July 10, 2015 12:02
Then again I do not understand why they first need / want to be. Are you any event no longer “top of mind” when you’re the last? And moreover you can not better polish / respond to the stabbing which has let drop your competitor during the presentation?

[Response changed by pimsaint on July 10, 2015 12:04]
tweaker2010
pimsaint • July 10, 2015 12:40
Agree, many people will still wait for the new iPhone and this already pre-order.
Furthermore, I find the Samsung smart move not to release a new phone mid-summer, most people love.
Martinus
@ Tweaker2010 • July 10, 2015 13:02
Release is different than announce, most people see in the store only what is for sale. We tweakers, however, is just different.

[Response edited by Martin on July 11, 2015 01:07]
Kafka
Ruw ER • July 10, 2015 14:01
That’s the problem with the Notes. Far too advanced.
Señor Sjon

[karma king] Samsung Galaxy S

July 10, 2015 12:04
This rumor has been in May / June and then again denied. Meanwhile, more details leak out ( SamMobile ) where I is not happy. Some things Screen stays for the third year in a row as large (5.65 “) Also, no bump to 4K resolution. Glass rear That’s actually withstanding a phablet . Such a surface is too smooth for one-handed operation on the move. Glass and replaceable battery also do not go together. Why do we now have contacted glass is beyond me. I think there is little premium to a delicate and smooth material to have on the road. No SD slot , this rumor is persistent because the file system UFS 2.0 does not support SD cards with the same controller. R / W should be 2x as fast, but so at the expense of interchangeable bulk storage. Then you get Apple’s pricing model in which you overpay for extra storage. Convenient such a camera that can film with very high resolutions … This is actually pick a Note 4 as they hopefully by the release of the Note 5 cheaper. Strikingly is that the S6 is already almost as expensive as the Note 4, while the unit is more than six months later (in many abo’s it saves only a tenner pay extra between the two).

: X

watercoolertje

[karma emperor]
Samsung
[karma emperor] Samsung Galaxy Note
[karma king]
Smartphones
[karma king] Samsung Galaxy S

@ Señor Sjon • July 10, 2015 12:10
They have glass because aluminum does not work with wireless charging, plastic or (and this is my favorite too!) Maarja there too many people whining about because that’s not premium (but sturdier, but who wants that now). SD goes I do not believe in coming, it would be a nice surprise if they are still in the know stop otherwise. SD still miss those the most (a 32GB phone and have now got to clean up with some relgelmaat, I refuse to pay 100 euros more for only 32GB extra), but I just sold mn 64GB UHS-1, so would cunt as those in the Note 5 is back

: D
Señor Sjon

[karma king] Samsung Galaxy S

watercoolertje • July 10, 2015 13:24
The G4 uses leather and is interchangeable. Leather or signs off in time, but is simply replaceable. Wireless charging is more of a gimmick than your phone can properly hold. I’ve really been tig S and iPhone 4 (S) seen with broken front and back. So far the premium feel in the wrong fall. It is also in the tendency to make the apparatus thin uncomfortable. So I suspect the S2 it is advertised to be made thinner than other devices, but with the original extended battery suddenly you had a device that was perfect in the hand.
Titan_Fox

[karma king]
Smartphones

July 10, 2015 12:33
The “new” iPhones (6s and 6s Plus) have only slightly smoother hardware and I think a better 4G / LTE modem for 4G +. For the rest, it is not very special. To be honest I do not expect the storm will run on those devices and that there was iPhone owners have been waiting for the iPhone 7.
gabba25
Titan_Fox • July 10, 2015 12:51
Force touch I think is the biggest change. Something that has not been used in smartphones. Can sometimes be something big.
Dorank
@ gabba25 • July 10, 2015 13:24
Apple Marketing at work. getPressure () exists in Android since 1.0 (not that I’ve had devices that were here for support other than 0 and 1 AFAIK). And I expect OSes also have support for that. What’s new is that the scale is no longer between 0 (no) and 1 (normal) but so is> 1 if kractigere pressure.

Tothabone
Dorank • July 10, 2015 17:09
Completely different technique and the difference is not marketing at Apple, but it works .. Infinite working until you have a good product, could learn a lot of brands.
Armpit Fresh
Dorank • July 10, 2015 18:13
That’s really comparing apples to oranges, what you’re talking about is a completely different technology and secretly tell you that even in your post. then you must also implement system wide and useful. And then your reference to previous versions suddenly no more at.
Dorank
OkselFris • July 10, 2015 19:08
This technique is different, I want to believe it, we are after almost 7 years have passed since the release of the 1.0 SDK. But the idea is the same. Only instead of printing “not” to “normal as the maximum” to expire normally shifted to not hold up, place around normal (overtakes via automatic calibration) a dead zone, et voila, you have the option to press harder on hardware it supports. I would not be surprised if in the future and SDKs is an additional method getPressure like it. And implement system wide useful: why is it in the API, any android application can since time immemorial been implemented. Only mist in most cases, the hardware support. This hardware fragmentation Apple also over the next few years. Does it add value to the user … The only thing I can suggest is games where you might keyboards pressing harder getting capital letters. But in normal UIs, this is again a non obvious way of additional inputs (and all platforms have put the trend to the non intuitive UI) BTW I am still phones (been) pressure capable hardware: – G1 -Note2 but then only with the pen. But the number of applications I’ve ever used it (to the debug info) was a sign / Doodle application.

quantumleapje
Dorank • July 10, 2015 20:42
Which demonstrates your story is not about him the technique, but how to implement and use. At Samsung see feautures appear and disappear, or they come in a poor implementation in the phone (see fingerprint scanner). Apple does things more wisely, they work better, and draws them consistently throughout the whole ecosystem.
svenM
Dorank • July 10, 2015 15:20
I do not know how it is technically implemented, but the notes also certainly do so since the note 2, at least in combination with the stylus.
Kenju
svenM • July 10, 2015 18:35
That is the digitizer from Wacom. That is not the same.
gabba25
Dorank • July 10, 2015 13:29
Lol, “trap” I therefore yourself. Really thought it was something new, because there are special screens are required.
Martinus
Titan_Fox • July 10, 2015 13:07
That, many say, every S release. Most have a subscribe for 2 years, so the one is in the first version, the other in the S version, so apple every 2 years brings a whole new you so everyone takes as much as possible.
Optel Ommetje
Titan_Fox • July 10, 2015 14:11
And if I could get a dollar for every tweaker who predicted here that the next iPhone will not storm is going to run I would have been a multimillionaire 😀 course 6s will again break all records. Apple has ordered a record number of 90 million. Bxizar …
Sky Lynx
Titan_Fox • July 10, 2015 15:35
I thought at first too until I read an interesting article on Boy Genius Report they come with a strong story why the iPhone 6s / 6s Plus will once again set a record: the largest group of iPhone users have an iPhone right now 5s (± 125 million). This group has a two-year contract generally concluded which will expire shortly after the release of the 6s / 6s Plus. They go en masse to upgrade to a new iPhone (read: new). And Apple knows himself very well, so what is the reason for the rumors about the 80/90 million units 6s / 6s Plus they have to produce at the time. Contrary to what our minds would say (little improvements compared to the previous model = probably no rush) 6s / 6s Plus will yet again break the usual sales records. offtopic: I also do not understand why you get -1. Your post makes sense and seems to me to almost all successors phones. Apple already seems a number of years to be the only exception.

[Response changed by Sky Lynx on July 10, 2015 15:35]
quantumleapje
Titan_Fox • July 10, 2015 20:24
I think it runs for many years storm, and that’s never because “those fantastic new specs.” That will be no different now. There are always people who prefer the S version because it is “the new iPhone in a better version.”
Afiŝo
July 10, 2015 17:43
Can I care no sausage, because that means that the 6 edge will soon be cheaper. ;););););)
watercoolertje

[karma emperor]
Samsung
[karma emperor] Samsung Galaxy Note
[karma king]
Smartphones
[karma king] Samsung Galaxy S

Afiso • July 10, 2015 18:30
Then you do the right care? That will decrease (if there is) still by Note 5: D
Afiŝo
watercoolertje • July 11, 2015 03:37
Hahahaha you’re right. I had read the comments and many were talking about the iPhone and found it not a good move by Samsung this and that, so I really responded automatically by the negative reactions. But actually responsive to the message it can care :)Bring on the discs 5. Is me that you see the prices for a loose edge 6 already starting to fall
fezoj
July 10, 2015 11:49
Nobody does initially an official announcement when they present their new devices but indeed they leak “secretly” both to advance but to get as much attention / to deduce the other. And then suddenly we see a beautiful new keynote … What’s different this time than otherwise

🙂

[Response changed by fezoj on July 10, 2015 12:00]
dark design
July 10, 2015 19:58
I personally look forward to the Samsung Note 5 because I use for about three years make a Samsung Note 2 and it would like to replace for a new phone from Samsung Note series. Am on the second note I have been all this time more than satisfied. My friend also has its note 2 had in use and is already a very happy time on the note 3. However, I am afraid that the Note 5 same design will get if the S6 from Samsung. This design I think generally okay, but my preference is given to aluminum with a coating (such as in the note 4). Advantages of the Note series are in my eyes: – Good battery life – Best of the best in hardware – Big screen – AMOLED – Quality of the camera – Firmness Maybe I’m biased because I have long been using a Samsung Note 2, but the Note series is really proved to me.

PostHEX
July 10, 2015 23:32
A growing news that Samsung also comes from the line Note the microSD slot tears. If it would be a € 300 phone, then there might still live with. But for € 800 it can be stolen for me.
Rhys08
July 11, 2015 01:25
Each Note purchased so far (in the Note 4 after then). Were always top of the class smartphones and outperformed the S-line in my opinion. Ben instead of the Note 4 6 switched to an iPhone, just to try. Is now doubt anyway to get back to the Note 5. But if they are to be just as close bonding with glass as the S6 (edge), it is quite a hefty dealbreaker The Note has always to been known that it is a multitasker where you could replace everything in terms of battery and SD card. Would really be a pity if they lose Samsung in the sight. But, we just wait it off!: X

stager
July 10, 2015 14:44
Very sorry that you’re this message in a Note 3 to read who has received lollipop, but by those whose Bluetooth update not working properly. That little bug ensures that your smart watch or car kit loses its connection (if any at all he gets a connection). Would still like to go for a new 5 by this bug and it does not solve by Samsung yet I look at alternatives.
Robby Town [Tweakers Plus]
stager • July 10, 2015 16:04
Makeshift option ?: factory recovery … (itself made ​​no factory recovery) have also Note 3 and had ollipop updates but have no problems. Bluetooth connections: VW / Radio Car Kit EARSON ER-151

stager
RobbyTown • July 10, 2015 22:04
Check else as the Note 3 topic. Problem affects more appliances in combination with various Bluetooth devices. Have tried everything. Perhaps I’ve been a bit incomplete in my reply.
Cornholio
July 10, 2015 11:39
A rumor of an announcement of an announcement.
it should not be crazier
Kiswum [Tweakers Plus]

[karma king]
Smartphones
[karma king] Samsung Galaxy S
[karma king]
Samsung

Cornholio • July 10, 2015 11:44
A rumor that a presentation / announcement from Samsung, mid-August.
So no

rumor of an announcement of an announcement.

I also wonder whether they actually go to present the Samsung S6 mini. This would go out of my head get a Snapdragon 615, but perhaps they can better their own soc use for this. Which has proven to be cool and yet very put good performances.
Karel17
Kiswum • July 10, 2015 11:48
Yes.
It is 1) a rumor 2) the presentation Samsung (announcement) will take place in August at the 3) to announce the Note 5. Also find it a bit too far to go Ontopic: The Note smartphones are always really nice unwise. Where previously they usually ‘too big’ were they really a good size. Screen is beautiful with fast hardware (and rather expensive).: P

Pearl Choco
@ Karel17 • July 10, 2015 13:32
Read the first sentence once again and find yourself your reasoning wrong.

🙂
1 2 Next
Reaction ban

Dear visitor,

Tweakers limits the functionality of the site for some countries to reduce spam, fraud and abuse.

Your IP address (117 207 194 102) has been reduced to country code IN and the country falls under this restriction. Your IP address is thus excluded from posting comments on Tweakers. For more information, also this explanation .

If you log in , we can determine whether this indeed applies to your account.

In many cases we can create personal exemptions, send an email before to frontpage@tweakers.net . Mention in which mail your user name and IP address.

“Tax showed interest in software Hacking Team ‘
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 again gets Zombie Mode

Microsoft Windows 10 , Apple iPhone 6s Star Wars: Battlefront (2015) Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Apple Watch Project CARS Nest Learning Thermostat Sony

Advertise Contact Display Options About Tweakers Your privacy Terms and Conditions Cookies

Followtweakers Like Tweakers Rss Feeds

© 1998 – 2015 Persgroep Online Services BV • Tweakers together with ao Auto Track and Carsom.nl Persgroep Online Services BV • Hosting by True
Tracker

ScrollRight

Viewing:-270

In: Technology & Gadgets Asked By: [17584 Red Star Level]

Answer this Question

You must be Logged In to post an Answer.

Not a member yet? Sign Up Now »