Find a Question:
US court prohibiting the sale of some Samsung phones based on Apple’s request
Federal Court in California ordered Alomrakh ban the sale of some of the smart phone company Samsung in the United States, which provide features that infringe three patents for invention owned by company Apple, the ban comes as part of the dispute between the two companies.
The on Monday, Judge Lucy Koh of the US District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order to enter into force 30 days after the verdict, the ban includes phones that have features such as “slide-to-unlock” feature and the possibility of automatic correction of words in some Samsung phones issued prior to the period of time.
It includes smartphones covered by the ban Samsung Admire and Galaxy Nexus and Galaxy Note and Galaxy Note II and Galaxy S II and Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch and Galaxy S II Skyrocket and Galaxy S III products stratosphere, which means the old smart phones from Samsung.
The court had issued an earlier summary of the judgment indicates that Samsung infringed patents relating to the advantage of the AutoCorrect, then the jury found that Samsung’s two other patents also violated, including those relating to the advantage of the slide to open, and the granting of compensation to Apple worth 119.6 million per patent violations.
The judge’s decision in favor of Apple, which has just begun to get the benefits of call against Samsung filed in the Court of California company, and the judge had refused earlier in the issuance of a permanent injunction, saying that Apple does not appear to be suffering from irreparable harm without a warrant, but The US Court of Appeals, “the Federal Circuit” has to rescind its decision and so the case back to the lower court for further proceedings.
The Samsung Order conditionally fine of up to $ 548 million in the case of patents and other invention in the same court violation, this amount is part of the damages their ability jury in another case in the Court of California for infringement of Apple utility and design patents both.
And it demanded Samsung from the Supreme Court to reconsider the principle of granting compensation to patents for the design and got support from some technology companies on this issue, including compensation each Samsung of infringing products profits despite the fact that the patent is only a fraction of the functionality of those products and offer, the company has paid.Viewing:-182
Answer this Question
You must be Logged In to post an Answer.
Not a member yet? Sign Up Now »
Star Points Scale
Earn points for Asking and Answering Questions!